Each American colony established by the British would have ended up being a country not a state. Those states found by the British where small, now compare that with the gigantic states that have around 1 million population.
Under British control more countries would exist today and the population of the America's would be double or even triple what it is now.
-
Edited by Silent Bob: 7/28/2013 1:35:43 AM*flips off OP*
-
Edited by TheEndofClass: 7/28/2013 1:26:26 AM"My name is lonepaul and I shit the Queen."
-
It's a good thing that happened or else world history would be an absolute and even greater nightmare.
-
More likely scenario: -Great Britian makes the first colony in America. -Kick the French out of Canada -Kick the Mexicans out of Texas through California -Expands through the west, just like already happened -Encroach on Mexico further, taking it over -Continue their war mongering ways and walk on the rest of Central America -Then suddenly they hit a brick wall while trying to advance on South America All their dice rolls just get blockaded by the largest string of 6's in history. So rather than totally exhausting their resources, the Redcoats hold and refortify their new southern boundary. And here you have Great Britain-West. One nation, under monarchy. NOT more independent countries.
-
"Britain's so great, everything Britain does is good and cannot be criticised." That's you every time you open your mouth. Stop it.
-
How much time do you put into these stories of yours? It's honestly amazing how people haven't branded you an attention whore by now.
-
I don't think that's a good ting.
-
..... Cool. Story. Bro Like we care in modern times
-
Your point being?
-
Edited by DELIVER ME MEMES: 7/27/2013 10:01:52 PMOP:[quote]this post brought to you by the 4th grade and now, a word from our sponsors: oi oi uk rulez lelelel i can memay face![/quote] do ye not know what the articles of confederation were? each state practically [i]was[/i] an independent country until the ratification of the second constitution, the Constitution of the United States of America ,in 1791.
-
Seriously Paul what point are you trying to make? Are you trying to insult America and boost Britain by saying Britain develops colonies better? I mean what's the point of this post? Would this be better for the world or worse? What are you trying to say here? That there'd be more world population if Britain had more colonies? Because we don't need more population that much.
-
So... what's your point?
-
[quote]the population of the America's would be double or even triple what it is now.[/quote] Nope.
-
With that mentality, your birth prevented other kids' birth.
-
Who cares?
-
[quote]Under British control more countries would exist today and the population of the America's would be double or even triple what it is now.[/quote]That doesn't sound like a good thing at all.
-
And this is why I don't understand where people get the ridiculous notion all Britons are intelligent from...
-
Well technicallyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy all current states are an individual country of its own all abiding under the Federal Government. We all know what happened when a couple states attempted to become independent though.
-
If you honestly believe that, you're stupid.
-
Why do you constantly have to make posts about America relating to Britain?
-
So much blind America hate on the forums lately...
-
So, wait. Are you saying the world would be better off if the 50 states that make up the US were all separate countries that had been ruled by the British? Or just territories like, Guam, the Philippines, Cuba, Puerto Rico etc? Or both?
-
Maybe Britain shouldn't have gone to war against Germany.
-
Where are the academics who believe this?
-
Like Puerto Rico and such? Or like all the South American countries? Or Central America? Or do you mean the colonies along the east coast?
-
Edited by Dustin Time 4Bed: 7/27/2013 8:52:36 PM>Coming from a Brit whose imperialism set the entire continent of Africa back centuries