JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

Varios

Navega una corriente de discusiones aleatorias.
Editado por JonnyMadDog1: 5/11/2019 1:36:39 AM
27

[SUPERTHREAD][Non-joke/non-food-related] Sick of the division and false-flagging. Wi're on the verge of civil war and this user doesn't want that. AMA about muh beliefs to talk [type] out in the name of civil discourse

"War is old men talking and young men dying." "The more one sweats during peacetime, the less they bleed in war." Bring it. This user is a sovereign individual human being that subscribes to what some call 'anarcho-capitalist' beliefs, the logical conclusion of libertarianism also known as 'voluntar[y]ism'. This user is also a MASSIVE (to put it mildly) conspiracy theorist and conspiracy analyst and familiar with praxeological and Socratic approaches and inductive and deductive reasoning. This user believes virtually everything boils down to an economic argument and that the answer is more freedom and options and opportunity and less State interference trying to 'game' a natural system. This should NOT be interpreted as hyper-Darwinism/Stirnirite Egoism. Big prowrasslin' fan, it's real not fake, both mainstream and many so-called 'alternative' news sites are fake and false-flag themselves and call each other out on it like it's a sick game some on both sides may be 'in' on. (((They))) may not be the ultimate evl despite many being in medias of many types and entertainment as a collective because the collective does not exist, nor does the majority, there is only the minority to the sacred individual unit. EPH6:12/LarkenRose's'TheIronWeb' and JohnGalt's speech from 'AtlasShrugged', look 'em up. It's NOT flesh-and-blood, it's not immigrants, documented OR NOT, it's not Muzzies or Cathlix, or whyty or blacky, it's ignorance, willful at that, left-brain and right-brain dominant cynicism and naivete, a lack of critical thinking and communication, fragile systems born psychos can exploit and that create sociopaths. It is a lack of faith in one's self, in others, and in free trade and sound money in a world of scarcity of resources. It is a lack of divorcing concept from execution by the monopoly on credit, arbitration, and defense known as 'the State'. The 'new world order' plays both major sides, it's not Tories and Labour, it's not Democrip and Reblodlican. It's not a false dichotomy of Zionizm cronyism vs. Communism as a consequential absolute. It's thinking that way, and believing in false equivalencies. Am 'open-borders' (buzzword and loaded term) yet not pro-suubsidization and importation en masse of incompatible people for nefarious purposes and recognize the concerns of pro-wall proponents, just disagree with all muh heart with their methodology and wish to provide new methodology. Am pro-choice and 'pro-life' (another loaded term). The free market fixes itself, trying to force 300 million or 7 billion people at gunpoint to subsidize abortion when that person may not believe in it or vice versa those who do believe in it funding the stopping of it are no different from each other. NO.Social-Engineering.Is.Required!!! The mistake yuh make in EVERY argument is making it out to be a moral imperative when the empirical premise is the issue-at-hand. Attack the WHYS and not the HOWS and focus on protecting one's own self and making one's own bed. F E E and A I E R make good articles on this, Redit Gold and Black is nice too as is Redit conspiracy and conspiracy theories. Redit Anarcho_Capitalism and Libertarianism have been co-opted and/or under attack by 'leftist'-minded folk either of the socialist variety (left-libertarians) and identitarian cancer in the form of fake-'right-wingers'. The ends may not justify the means and the needs of the many may not invalidate the needs of the one in this user's personal opinion, but those are not to be brought into professional arguments, which is what charlatans on TV and the internet do with their stupid shows and cheap suits and dresses, claiming to be traditional or uplifting of minorities and those oppressed when they're fake heroes and agitprop fighting with agitprop, enslaving themselves to others and enslaving others to themselves. 'Right-wing' means individual over the collective. 'Left-wing' means collective rights over the individual's choices. There are only negative rights not positive rights. The government does not truly exist, it is illegitimate and either the Consertution authorized such shenanigans or it was powerless in preventing them. 'Conservative' and 'liberal' are NOT labels to identify as or see others as, as nouns, but adjectives, action-process descriptors whether or not an action is in-line with that particular philosophy. One or something can be BOTH of these things, they were originally economic terms and not social ones. Do not conflate definitions to where liberal means libertine and conservative means prudishly traditional. The basis of libertarianism is the respect for private property and free association and disassociation (discrimination is not a bad word) and one can be as libertine or trad as they want, just don't make others pay for it. One does not have a philosophy if one has to integrate bobs-and-weaves into it. Molymeme and Chapiro are charlatans. There's fake liberals, fake conservatives, fake anarchists, and fake socialists/communists/fascists everywhere it seems and their prior incarnation's generation's adherents would've sent many of them today to the gulags and chambers. All of these and more are forms of central planning via coercion and it doesn't work. All three forms of Platonic government do not work. Anarchy does not mean 'no rules' it means 'no rulers'. It means polycentricity, it means options in credit, arbitration and defense (throw agriculture and education in there as well, also separate from schooling sometimes, especially today). Gonna pump the brakes here before this spirals into a wall-of-text the sitting sociopath-in-chief number 45 and puppet to other entities would be proud of, game's on and hungry and need to work out. DISCUSS CIVILLY!

Publicando en idioma:

 

Pórtate bien. Echa un vistazo a nuestro Código de conducta antes de publicar tu mensaje. Cancelar Editar Crear escuadra Publicar

Ver el resto del tema
  • REPLY PRT 3: It doesn't MATTER if one believes the ends justify the means or not (eye don't think they do, if there is a mutual exlusivity between pragmatism and being principled, but there doesn't HAVE to be, there IS a pragmatic reason for being principled and ethical, even Adm freakn' sociopathic hypocrite and/or psyop Kokehsh admitted this! Thaht Guy T/T J Brwn said iz father said some advice once that 'principles don't need to be opposed to profit, principles = profit', people KNOW what they are buying from yuh or getting when they give yuh money if principled, they feel their investmen was safer, but pragmatists are harder to be trusted....if this user gives money to this little girl who plays border patrol for a bulletproof vest, does this user have to worry about 'er spending it on alcohol and hurting people and keeping this user locked in when this user doesn't agree with that beleif of 'ers? Will seh use it to give to terrorist Eurotrash friends this user didn't want to fund? Will jackbooted thugs think this user is funding terrorism if logs of such a transaction get out? Basically, transparency is needed and free markets allow for that and encourage that, whereas government retains Face book's monopoly and gives no incentive for people to not be screwed over and their privacy invaded!!! Read Anthny deJasay debunking Buchann's contractarianism from '97. Basically, if the State is needed to enforce contracts, and the State was not always around, how did it come into existence and was trade not happening before it??? There are over a DOZEN real life examples this user could list of societies compatible with AnCap/libertarian thought and free trade, basically STATELESS societies existing in history, even to this day some of them, and some to come soon in the works, but this user continues to run out of space here....lol. But the aforementioned deep sea mercantilism predates the State and free trade existed between early humans before international waters were called that. There are land-based examples on almost all continents too may list later, getting tired and hungry and about to go to breakfast before bed soon... TL;DR: 'Capitalism' is/was a slur coined by Krl Mrx funded by the Rothchld's who declared war on humanity AND this country before it was conceived and bet on all sides because of fragile little egos of the so-called descendants of giants to discredit free markets, they CANNOT be 'defended' by the State, the State is not compatible with the market. 'Anarcho-capitalism' is a bit of a buzzword or tainted by cultural lexicographical optics so this user doesn't ALWAYS say it or suggest it without the disclaimer this user means voluntarism/libertarianism because it seems to 'trigger' so many out there raised to hate the word from birth. What is REALLY being attacked and described is CRONYISM/CORPORATISM/THE CORPORATOCRACY/KAKISTOCRACY/PSYCHOPATHOCRACY (GrehgCatohn wrote a good book called the Joys of the Psychopathocracy, basically the further away from the individual one gets, the more psychopathic one gets and fragile a system). Eso also did a good vid on classical liberalism, liberalism, and libertarianism. Liberalism aims to achieve a specific mode of government, classical liberalism is rooted in doctrine but no metaphysical principles, libertarianism has metaphysical principles. Government is saying wi are animals and need to be ruled or to rule, the natural progression, in THIS USER'S opinion is to grow beyond needing government or the church to keep this user's ego in-check. TL;DR TL;DR: Yuh don't need the State or the church to keep yr ego in-check. Feudalism is ALREADY what wi live in, it's called Federalism and it doesn't work. The State is NOT sustainable and will do ANYTHING to sustain itself...even kylling its own for more food and room...it ALWAYS happens!!! And it DOESN'T NEED TO! StLouis city, for example, wouldn't be such a shythole if the government didn't keep them from building up with skyscrapers (there are articles on that). Deregulation and a lack of needing licenses and permits for shyt like lemonade stands leads to peace and prosperity. No currency debasement and welfare/warfare state and having free trade and sound money is peace and prosperity. It is NOT something to BRING to people, but to ALLOW to flourish. TL;DR TL;DR TL;DR Not saying anything about being super duper hyper-Darwinist. Liberal =/= libertine, conservative =/= traditional, libertarianism =/= libertine or liberal. Librtarian means one can be as party going or church going as one wants, just don't make this user pay4it.

    Publicando en idioma:

     

    Pórtate bien. Echa un vistazo a nuestro Código de conducta antes de publicar tu mensaje. Cancelar Editar Crear escuadra Publicar

No se te permite acceder a este contenido.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon