"War is old men talking and young men dying." "The more one sweats during peacetime, the less they bleed in war." Bring it. This user is a sovereign individual human being that subscribes to what some call 'anarcho-capitalist' beliefs, the logical conclusion of libertarianism also known as 'voluntar[y]ism'. This user is also a MASSIVE (to put it mildly) conspiracy theorist and conspiracy analyst and familiar with praxeological and Socratic approaches and inductive and deductive reasoning. This user believes virtually everything boils down to an economic argument and that the answer is more freedom and options and opportunity and less State interference trying to 'game' a natural system. This should NOT be interpreted as hyper-Darwinism/Stirnirite Egoism. Big prowrasslin' fan, it's real not fake, both mainstream and many so-called 'alternative' news sites are fake and false-flag themselves and call each other out on it like it's a sick game some on both sides may be 'in' on. (((They))) may not be the ultimate evl despite many being in medias of many types and entertainment as a collective because the collective does not exist, nor does the majority, there is only the minority to the sacred individual unit. EPH6:12/LarkenRose's'TheIronWeb' and JohnGalt's speech from 'AtlasShrugged', look 'em up. It's NOT flesh-and-blood, it's not immigrants, documented OR NOT, it's not Muzzies or Cathlix, or whyty or blacky, it's ignorance, willful at that, left-brain and right-brain dominant cynicism and naivete, a lack of critical thinking and communication, fragile systems born psychos can exploit and that create sociopaths. It is a lack of faith in one's self, in others, and in free trade and sound money in a world of scarcity of resources. It is a lack of divorcing concept from execution by the monopoly on credit, arbitration, and defense known as 'the State'. The 'new world order' plays both major sides, it's not Tories and Labour, it's not Democrip and Reblodlican. It's not a false dichotomy of Zionizm cronyism vs. Communism as a consequential absolute. It's thinking that way, and believing in false equivalencies. Am 'open-borders' (buzzword and loaded term) yet not pro-suubsidization and importation en masse of incompatible people for nefarious purposes and recognize the concerns of pro-wall proponents, just disagree with all muh heart with their methodology and wish to provide new methodology. Am pro-choice and 'pro-life' (another loaded term). The free market fixes itself, trying to force 300 million or 7 billion people at gunpoint to subsidize abortion when that person may not believe in it or vice versa those who do believe in it funding the stopping of it are no different from each other. NO.Social-Engineering.Is.Required!!! The mistake yuh make in EVERY argument is making it out to be a moral imperative when the empirical premise is the issue-at-hand. Attack the WHYS and not the HOWS and focus on protecting one's own self and making one's own bed. F E E and A I E R make good articles on this, Redit Gold and Black is nice too as is Redit conspiracy and conspiracy theories. Redit Anarcho_Capitalism and Libertarianism have been co-opted and/or under attack by 'leftist'-minded folk either of the socialist variety (left-libertarians) and identitarian cancer in the form of fake-'right-wingers'. The ends may not justify the means and the needs of the many may not invalidate the needs of the one in this user's personal opinion, but those are not to be brought into professional arguments, which is what charlatans on TV and the internet do with their stupid shows and cheap suits and dresses, claiming to be traditional or uplifting of minorities and those oppressed when they're fake heroes and agitprop fighting with agitprop, enslaving themselves to others and enslaving others to themselves. 'Right-wing' means individual over the collective. 'Left-wing' means collective rights over the individual's choices. There are only negative rights not positive rights. The government does not truly exist, it is illegitimate and either the Consertution authorized such shenanigans or it was powerless in preventing them. 'Conservative' and 'liberal' are NOT labels to identify as or see others as, as nouns, but adjectives, action-process descriptors whether or not an action is in-line with that particular philosophy. One or something can be BOTH of these things, they were originally economic terms and not social ones. Do not conflate definitions to where liberal means libertine and conservative means prudishly traditional. The basis of libertarianism is the respect for private property and free association and disassociation (discrimination is not a bad word) and one can be as libertine or trad as they want, just don't make others pay for it. One does not have a philosophy if one has to integrate bobs-and-weaves into it. Molymeme and Chapiro are charlatans. There's fake liberals, fake conservatives, fake anarchists, and fake socialists/communists/fascists everywhere it seems and their prior incarnation's generation's adherents would've sent many of them today to the gulags and chambers. All of these and more are forms of central planning via coercion and it doesn't work. All three forms of Platonic government do not work. Anarchy does not mean 'no rules' it means 'no rulers'. It means polycentricity, it means options in credit, arbitration and defense (throw agriculture and education in there as well, also separate from schooling sometimes, especially today). Gonna pump the brakes here before this spirals into a wall-of-text the sitting sociopath-in-chief number 45 and puppet to other entities would be proud of, game's on and hungry and need to work out. DISCUSS CIVILLY!