[url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/23/catholic-hospital-argues-_n_2534383.html?utm_hp_ref=mostpopular]Article[/url]
[quote]Catholic organizations have for decades fought to change federal and state laws that fail to protect “unborn persons,” and Catholic Health’s lawyers in this case had the chance to set precedent bolstering anti-abortion legal arguments. Instead, they are arguing state law protects doctors from liability concerning unborn fetuses on grounds that those fetuses are not persons with legal rights.
As Jason Langley, an attorney with Denver-based Kennedy Childs, argued in one of the briefs he filed for the defense, the court “should not overturn the long-standing rule in Colorado that the term ‘person,’ as is used in the Wrongful Death Act, encompasses only individuals born alive. Colorado state courts define ‘person’ under the Act to include only those born alive. Therefore Plaintiffs cannot maintain wrongful death claims based on two unborn fetuses.”[/quote]
So here's what happened: A woman who was 7 months pregnant went to the hospital with chest pains. The doctor who was on call didn't answer a page and didn't make it to the hospital in time to save the woman's babies. The woman's husband is filing a wrongful death lawsuit against the hospital on behalf of the two fetuses that died.
But now, the hospital's lawyers are saying that the court should not recognize fetuses as people for the purposes of wrongful death lawsuits. If the hospital wins, then they will have further cemented the laws that they fight to overturn.
So do you think that the hospital was forced into this situation and has no choice but to argue that fetuses are not people, even though they are a Catholic organization that defines "life" as starting at conception? Or do you think that the hospital is displaying hypocrisy?
-
Life does not start at conception. It starts several months down the line when the woman has a single living organism inside her. What's so hard to get about that?
-
how odd
-
>Beliefs >Money >money always wins in this regard
-
You should add the word "hypocritically" before "argues" in the title.
-
And the only people who win in this entire situation? The lawyers.
-
They're willing to overturn their own religious creed and morality for money?
-
Edited by Codename 207: 1/24/2013 6:04:33 PMIf they argue 'right to life', then they have to deal with the consequences of that stance. This is hypocritical, and if the hospital succeeds in winning this lawsuit (which I doubt) then most who argue 'right to life' have no base for any legal action.
-
Person =/= life
-
Imagine that, putting their profits before principle.
-
I wouldn't say a wrongful death suit is in order. But certainly some action should be taken against the doctor who was on call? That's between the hospital and the doctor in question though.
-
So much hypocrisy.
-
[quote]So do you think that the hospital was forced into this situation and has no choice but to argue that fetuses are not people, even though they are a Catholic organization that defines "life" as starting at conception? Or do you think that the hospital is displaying hypocrisy?[/quote]Well.. probably a little of both.
-
Edited by Dredd: 1/24/2013 5:29:11 PMThey could just accept the lawsuit considering the the doctor is at fault for being late.
-
These threads are really getting tiresome.