With the recent talk of belief in plate tectonics, I thought it would be good to clarify the overall tectonic structure of the Flat Earth. Essentially, the Flat Earth is cylindrical in shape, and is comprised of three primary layers encased by a ring of ice. The "upwards" motion of the Flat Earth Caused by Universal Acceleration, combined with the non-gravitational obligate tendency of all unsupported objects to fall "downwards" through space, compresses the earth between opposite forces. These opposing forces hold the Flat Earth's tectonic structure in place and provide the pressure necessary to super heat the molten layer.
http://i.imgur.com/r9S3xwn.jpg
[spoiler]I am going to be busy this week, so I might not respond to many of you. But I will try to address your concerns eventually. Thanks.[/spoiler]
-
I have a serious question. Are the other things in the universe flat as well, like the sun and moon for example, that's one thing that's always bugged me about this theory
-
I thought the earth was pentagonal. [spoiler]The jolliest (and luckiest) seven you will ever meet[/spoiler]
-
Hey guys. What do you think is on the other side? [spoiler]Spooky ghost monsters probably.[/spoiler]
-
-
Tell us why we can start in China, on the east part of our world map, go east, and not only [i]not fall off of Earth, but land in California, on the west part of our world map[/i].
-
-
由Corvo Attano編輯: 12/10/2016 5:23:53 PM
-
由Sainyule編輯: 12/11/2016 5:30:26 AM[quote]With the recent talk of belief in plate tectonics, I thought it would be good to clarify the overall tectonic structure of the Flat Earth.[/quote] Well tectonics only deal with the Earth's Crust. Why am I viewing an image of "flat" earths layers? [quote]Essentially, the Flat Earth is cylindrical in shape, and is comprised of three primary layers encased by a ring of ice.[/quote] You do understand that means the Earth isn't flat if it's cylindrical. You can't just slap an image of the earth on top of a cylinder and neglect it's sides and bottom. So you just flat out admitted flat earth is fake. What's also interesting is how we do not see this ring of ice from the surface. The size of this ring is bigger than the Earth and therefore visible, clearly. Now I know what you're gonna say, we do see it it's the sky! No, that's our atmosphere. Not to mention this ring of ice will be miles across, that means nothing can pretty much hit earth from space unless it's traveling at speeds that are unreachable. Saturn's ring is 175,000 miles across. Judging by the fact saturn is about 9.5 times bigger than earth we can see that this ring is still 18,500 miles. Yet we have had spaceships exit our atmosphere and meteors crash onto earth. How were they able to exit/enter our atmosphere. [quote]The "upwards" motion of the Flat Earth Caused by Universal Acceleration, combined with the non-gravitational obligate tendency of all unsupported objects to fall "downwards" through space, compresses the earth between opposite forces.[/quote] You were the one to tell me there is no direction in space yet here is something falling downwards. But things don't fall downward without something pulling or pushing. We have concluded there is no air resistance in space so nothing in pushing it, so now there's a force pulling it. You refuse to call it gravity, so tell me what is this sentient force pulling on the earth. But here's something special that I don't know if you neglected to mention or not but, there's no force on the sides. You see, if there were forces pushing on the sides that would counter all "why don't you fall off the edge" rebuttals. It would also allow the earth to keep its cylindrical shape. This model will constantly press the earth, crushing it and spreading it out. Therefore the distance between where I live and the store would increase daily, weekly, monthly, depending on how powerful these forces are. Which we know your Flat earth is moving up at 9.81m/s^2. Here's yet another point you forgot to mention. It's almost as if you just add onto the theory everytime. You see this force pulling the flat earth would not be able to counter and compress the earth. It will only be able to counter it. To compress and counter it would have to be a pushing force from above. Plus your earth would have to be accelerating at 19.62m/s^2 and experience a resistance of 9.81m/s^2 to still be compressed and be countered. This image has quiet literally exposed you as more of a troll than an actual flat earth believer. Tbh, after this I think I don't want to respond to anymore of these threads.
-
I bet your mother and father are related. The main thing these people can't explain is the curvature witnessed at one mile to two miles between two points. If it was flat, on a good day I should be able to laugh at France (for generally being a crap-hole) with a telescope.....I cannot, because the earth is round.
-
Don't you just love it when someone puts so much effort into proving a stupid theory and look smart, and they still end up looking dumb for trying to prove the theory in the first place, and on top of that, wasting so much time and effort in the project?
-
-
-
-
I respect your beliefs, but why is it according to your view of the world when I walk in one direction long enough that I end up at the same place?
-
由C00LC0W247編輯: 12/9/2016 11:55:21 PMSo what would happen if someone went to the edge of the earth and fell off? And why can people circumnavigate the globe? What does the bottom of the earth look like?
-
1. People who believe in flat earth are too stupid to make something like that. This is plagiarism. 2. Just shut up with your bs already.
-
Okay, I have a question. Suppose this 'Flat Earth' theory were true. If you were to fall of the edge, where would you land on the earth? I mean, gravity pulls us to the center of the planet, so would you just end up on the other side of earth? Or would you continue falling, but never actually landing on earth? Like entering orbit?
-
1 回覆
-
-